Rules for Drawing New Montana Legislative Districts Adopted | 406 Politics

This language was previously included in the discretionary criteria at the last meeting of the committee to develop rules for congressional districts. But Republicans opposed its inclusion in legislative criteria, arguing it would effectively force

This language was previously included in the discretionary criteria at the last meeting of the committee to develop rules for congressional districts. But Republicans opposed its inclusion in legislative criteria, arguing it would effectively force the commission to inject political results into the map-drawing process.

Support local journalism

Your membership makes our reporting possible.

{{featured_button_text}}

“If we go down this path, I think it will be more difficult for us to reach consensus and we will have enough things to discuss on the basis of the criteria without having a desired political outcome clearly marked at the top, which will only do ‘igniting a lot of people on both sides of the aisle,’ said Jeff Essman, one of the two Republican commissioners.

Democrats have argued that more competitive districts result in elected officials more representative of their constituents and more likely to actively campaign for their votes.

“If you want to dampen the noise in our society and partisanship, one way to do that is to increase competitiveness,” Democratic Commissioner Joe Lamson said.

Smith ultimately sided with the Democrats on the proposal, which was passed 3-2. She argued that the change was slight, referring to another discretionary goal, ensuring that no party is “unduly” favored by the districts, on which the commission had largely agreed.


Source link